| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Bloggers
Leonard T. Harris
Kevin D. Rollins Michael Ostrolenk Robert Capozzi Paul Gessing Norm Singleton Jim Turbett Carl Milsted, Jr. ChemicalAli James Plummer Stephen Gordon Daryl Sawyer Micah Tillman Categories
A Better World
Not Playing It Safe in Uganda Escaping the State? "Both our laws and our highest ideals" Obama -- Beacon of Hope? Lions for Lambs Lost Lesson of Thanksgiving Woodstock > Vietnam as Yin > Yang Last Night's Republican Debate The Rub on Vick Aaron Russo, RIP The Simpsons as Free Liberal Mythology? Notes on Sicko Greenberg on Immigration Someone in cable "news" has a clue Us (Us Us Us Us), and Them (Them Them Them).... Virginia Tech Every Day Ending Poverty: What Works? Amazing Grace Review Amazing Grace Let Me In--Recovery from Autism is Possible! Ron Paul Running for Prez! Left-Libertarians and workers of the world unite! On the Passing of Milton Friedman 300 million people Institute for Justice -- A Pro-Freedom Gem Global Family and Day of Peace Day or where is Tom Lehrer when you really need him! A failure to communicate The Tree Climbing Actress About Free For All Digg Away! Eric Dondero and The Free Liberal Changing of the Guard Bob Capozzi, Senior Editor Corporate State and Medicine Testing, 1,2,3... Introducing Free For All -- The Free Liberal Blog Pre-launch Testing Economics Enivornmentalism Turns Against Itself *UPDATED* Milton Friedman: Singlehandedly responsible for libertarianism Wal Mart Katrina Response Illustrates Government's Failure Vote for Freedom Warmongering vs. Socialism Fed to Blame? Undo the Obstacles to the Manifestation of Comparative Advantage The Mercantilist Impulse Bottoms Up Boudreaux on the Falling Dollar Liberty Dollars: What's the Big Deal? Colorado Residents Missing Rebates Club for Growth Assessment of Ron Paul: Fair or Hatchet Job? What is Libertarian Paternalism? Huckabee's Smoking Ban Wall Street's Nanny Ron Paul and Bernanke Private Dollars Lead New Orleans Recovery No Magic Wand Whole Foods, Monopolist? The Inflation Tax Politically Incorrect and proud of it The great inflation cover-up The biggest lies told by the state Beckham: Not About the Money The Matter of $1 Tyler Cowen Calls for Carbon Tax Trans-Texas Corridor and Sovreignty A Desire Named Streetcar Pre-K in the Womb? Does the Dear Leader Understand Incentives? Too High? Why so Low? Uncle Sam: worse than Enron Taxaphobia? 10 Worst Government Programs Problems with geoanarchism? Assume We Do Education Find out if you could be on Leno's "Jaywalking" Vouchers defeated in Utah A Free Market in Education? Energy Enivornmentalism Turns Against Itself *UPDATED* Calculating the Cost of a Carbon Tax The Price of Gas, Again Problem Already Solved? Life After the Oil Crash 4 Life After the Oil Crash 3 Life After the Oil Crash 2 Life After the Oil Crash Europe Sticking it to the Welfare State Austrian Darkness & EU Light Events “Who Cares About Anarchy When You Can Have Limited Government?” Is Extremism a Virtue? Is Extremism a Virtue? It’s All Opportunism "Immigration reform and its challenges" -- event this Wednesday Robert Fuller Event at Busboys and Poets Right Against War with Iran Foreign Policy Do Muslims Really Hate Us? The Lies Have It Burying Hitler Israel: NIE Report Could Spark War Bomb Iran, bomb, bomb, Iran Why did libertarians support the war? John Howard Deserved to Lose A Legacy of Losing: JFK, Obama and Viet Nam Disagreeing with Ron Paul Another great, but obscure anti-war classic Iraq = Vietnam? Bush: President for Life? Response to Randy Barnett The Push to Keep Us in Iraq Bizarro Libertarianism The CIA: Still evil after all these years Reason author Clueless on libertarian foreign policy USS Liberty Immigration Illegal Immigration and Moral Turpitude Immigration and Polls Ron Paul Ad Not What I'm Donating For Immigration: Global Warming on the right Republicans: Again the Stupid Party Individualist Values Undercutting Collectivist Thinking, One Award at a Time Is Your Doctor/Lawyer/Accountant Endangering Your Privacy? Politicians Live by One Set of Rules, We Live by Another Early Retirement = Unpatriotic? Free to be Fatty US, Britian Ethnically Cleanse Diego Garcia Lost Libertarianism at Watership Down McCain Should Have Been at Woodstock Libertarian Paternalism? Do we serve the state or does the state serve us? The Love of Power vs. Power of Love Hey Hillary (and the rest of the nicotine Nazis) A bad argument for ending prohibition Another great Libertarian song Latest Bush Concept: Loyalty Day! Workers of the world unite and smash the state! Reps. Rangel and Flake agree??? Libertarian horror New Mexico Property Owners Finally Protecte New Mexico Becomes 11th State to Adopt Medical Marijuana Big Government Conservatives Dixie Chicks Among Esteemed Outlaws How to Disable RFID Chips in Your New Passport Muhammad Ali's Mixed Legacy Pro-peace, Pro-slavery? Sexy Nurses Illegal? Important new book Bipartisan thuggery Re: Bad idea dead Milton Friedman's greatest accomplishment Remember, Remember Remember, Remember, re: Rendering unto Caesar Rendering unto Caesar Enough to make any libertarian (or red-blooded Ayn Rand fan) drool. Gangster Politicians Re: Reform the LP Is Liberty on the March, Backwards??? Rockin in the Free World Snakes on a Plane "Libertarians" for the draft? Killing the Death Tax: A Liberal's View Re: the Pesky Section 8 Destroying Individual Virtue Medical Freedom CATO versus Michael Moore WWE versus the state: round II Brave New World Update Brave New World Update Good News in the War on Drugs Invasion of the Body Snatchers? The Marginal Benefit of Health Care Who's Afraid of Frankenstein? Natural Rights Thought Crimes and Misdemeanors Blast from the Past No Rights? Freedom of Speech...yeah, right Korean Hostage Deal Versus Religious Liberty Speaking of Marijuana and Al Gore III Defending Al Gore III The Once and Future Republic of Vermont Superbowl Gambling and Silly Laws Atoms in the Here and Now The Last Straw for Bush Government Goons Murder Puppies! Hollywood Just Doesn't Get It Mr. Libertarian Thinking about Bob thinking about Darfur Go see Sophie Scholl-The Final Days Ron Paul, Big-Government Believer? Offensive and Intolerable A Priori Anarchists Am I a Utilitarian? Photos Free Liberals at the National Taxpayers Union Conference Politics Presidential Cult? Obama: Pot Smokers' Choice? Ron Paul #1 on Amazon Undercutting Collectivist Thinking, One Award at a Time Enivornmentalism Turns Against Itself *UPDATED* Hillary Hung On Obama Between the Extremes of Excess and . . . Excess? Obama under Attack over Patriotism at Debate Hillary vs. McCain Faux Pas: Which Matters More? You Libertarian Relativist, You Forget Iceland 1000 AD. How's About Switzerland Now? Mad Hatter Daze Taxing v. Killing Peasants Paying for It Obama: The Best Antiwar Option Left Not So Fast Change in DC without "Debaathification?" 09: Cause for Optimism? John McCain: Unfit to Lead Is The Path to Liberty to the North? Obama Can Fix America's Image Ba-Bye, Rudy and Fred Work for a Corporation, Democrats Say Camelot Gathers 'Round Petraeus '12? Asymmetrical Information Endorsements Giving Credit Where It Is Due Exploding Myths Running and Hiding The OTHER Open Letter Racist Words vs. Racist Deeds Haters As Cowards Ron Paul Isn't a Racist Thoughts on New Hampshire Fox News, Ron Paul and Conservatives Challengers from the Mainstream Love and Hate, Iowa Style [Blank] Need Not Apply Welcome to 08 Go Home, Ron Paul! Who Would Reagan Vote For? Huckabee: The Last Whig This is getting INTERESTING! Ron Paul Raises Record Cash Rodney King: Call Your Office Ron Paul v. the Beltway Libertarians Wonderful Ron Paul Article in Washington Post Paranoia, self destroyer Republican Rehab "Healthy" State Seeking Perfection? Jay Leno and Ron Paul Missing Warren G. Harding Ron Paul on PBS NewsHour Paul Jacob Indicted Heresies Out Loud "Don't Tase Me, Bro" Never Underestimate the “Power” of Denial Time for fascism Strippers for Ron Paul on Tucker Giuliani's Dangerous Bluster The Joys of Transpartisanship Is Hillary a Neocon? Ron Paul and the Libertarian National Convention Talk to those we don't agree with? Heaven Forbid! NY Times on Ron Paul On the "Edge" Citizen's Dividend and Health Insurance The Chasm of Abstraction In a free market... Sheehan for Congress? Closed-source Ames straw poll needs paper ballots The Spy Who Didn't Love Me More on Iowa, Ron Paul For peace and trust can win the day, despite of all your losing. Iowans for Tax Relief But Not Ron Paul Ron Paul Making Waves on the Net Human "Capital"? Ron Paul on the Daily Show w/ Jon Stewart Why do libertarians eat their own? Did Rudy "Win"? Fly in the Ointment? Stepping In It Ron Paul's Goldwater Moment New Media and Mike Gravel The GOP's Rodney Dangerfield Strange Bedfellows Never turn your back on the family David Brooks is Wrong Giuliani and the Price of Bread Who says politicians are stupid? Expanding the welfare state for fun and profit The loyal opposition Dispatches from Bizaroworld If you only buy one book by a Presidential candidate this year Bush and Chavez: A Marriage Made in Hell Does War Make Presidents Great? George Will on Ron Paul The on again, off again saga of global climate change My favorite bureaucrat Bruce Bartlett Takes a Hatchet to the Libertarian Party (and other third parties as well) Jon Stewart and the 2006 Election Will Triumphant Democrats Push Liberalism or Socialism? More on Libertarian Democrats Libertarian Democrats: NOT Libertarian-Democrats? Re: the cult of the state Reform the LP? The Vitiated Center Workers of the world unite...for liberty The Republicans' secret weapon Best idea I've heard all week The "unfree" liberal Moderation Without Meaning? Voter Participation is Not Paramount Jon Stewart: Enemy of Democracy? Political Whores Needed? The Milsted Strategy Feingold's predecessor More thoughts on Darfur The Other Enemy of Free Enterprise I'm a John Mackey Libertarian Hillary the failure Five excuses cover all government errors GOP war on the Family Sure to be Unpopular Partisan Talk Show Hosts Oppose a personality cult? You're a leftist! Cheney and Spin Not Very Open-Minded, Not Very Transpartisan You Gotta Love Lawyers Is Gore A Civil Libertarian? Corruption and Benefit Abramoff -- Seducer? Third Party Chances Rule of Law Illegally Download Music, Lose Your House? The Truman Transformation The Thugs of Redford Township Park Police Thugs Destroy Liberty in the Shadow of Jefferson Taxation is Theft. Go for it! 283 Nonarchy Pods -- Comin' Right Up “Original Intent”: Then, Now and Forever Alberto Gonzales Steps Down Orwell update State Secrets and National Security The Secretive Execution of Saddam Hussein The Case of Cory Maye TFL Update Publish JDM! Stumbling on Buddha The Free Liberal -- Expanding its Presence Nationwide Featured on the Free Liberal The Freedomnista Movement Ron Paul r(EVOL)tionary triumphs Happy Birthday Paul Jacob! Lew Rockwell? Is the Horse Dead? Despicable Behavior The L Word Is the Libertarian Party worth the fight? A Dear Friend Lost We broke it, we bought it? Fall reading The Nazi Welfare State Notes from the Parlor Game Hands held high quote of the month Take a few minutes See Ron Paul Wednesday Quote of the week Ron Paul Revolution Mises Media Read two books Left and Right Cowen’s “Package Deal” The Movement Theory of Knowledge Tectonic Ch Ch Ch Changes Logical Atomism and Truth Claims The Transitory Nature of Partisan Hacks Don't Quote Me on that... The Seen and the Unseen Theory and Consequences If a Tree Falls in the Woods… Transpartisanship Mob Mentality in the Ron Paul Revolution? Agreeing with Jonah Goldberg -- Twice! Ron Paul supporter spreading democracy from Iraq Polarized Too Extreme Very Silly Love, A is A style Firefly is returning Miss Bimbo isn't Shakespeare Hillary the Robot (at SOTU) For the Children Good enough for government work I Know An Old Lady... Brave New World Update What's in a name? Anti-Terror Extortion? Greatest Prank Ever The Purity of Being Broke? Ayn Rand Greeting Cards Achewood on Hating America and Anarchy War on Drugs Are you going to arrest me, Governor Romney? State Medical Marijuana Laws Under Attack in New Mexico The Right Kind of Flip-Flopping 55 Years for Weed? War on Terror Orwell update Hornberger Takes on the Wall Street Journal Dilbert Author Skewers Ahmadinejad Visit Panic (graphic language) Harry Potter's alright, but make mine Buffy Bush Backs Down on Torture If Big Brother can make it there... Terror debate Ron Paul-Giuliani Exchange on War Ron Paul Stands Up for Reality in Republican Debate Pentagon Lies Exposed Today Peace Movement Must Take on AIPAC Is Cheney Living in an Alternate Universe? Orwell update The Case Against War 4 Terror Plots Thwarted? The Feingold Option Can Congress Stop the War? Ahmadinejad and Bush: Something in Common 90% of Iraqis "We Were Better off Under Saddam" Libertarian Warmongers? The Lessons of Vietnam? Hint for Democrats: Protect Whistleblowers Pat Tillman's Birthday Keith Olbermann It is happening here 9--11 and cult of the omnipotent state Osama bin Laden as Cultural Icon The importance of foreign policy More on Israel's Aggression in Lebanon What is going on in Lebanon/Israel? Prominent Neo-Con: Suspend Constitution! The WTC Memorial and Admissions Fees Ann Coulter is insane The Truth Will get you in Trouble Cartoon Violence Conspiracy Theory Conspiracies McCain on Torture
Search
Archives
May 2008
April 2008 March 2008 February 2008 January 2008 December 2007 November 2007 October 2007 September 2007 August 2007 July 2007 June 2007 May 2007 April 2007 March 2007 February 2007 January 2007 December 2006 November 2006 October 2006 September 2006 August 2006 July 2006 June 2006 May 2006 April 2006 March 2006 February 2006 January 2006 December 2005 November 2005 September 2005
Recent Entries
“Who Cares About Anarchy When You Can Have Limited Government?”
Illegally Download Music, Lose Your House? Presidential Cult? Obama: Pot Smokers' Choice? The Truman Transformation National Review Reviews "The Revolution" Not Playing It Safe in Uganda What Happens When You Don't Read The Free Liberal Ron Paul #1 on Amazon The Thugs of Redford Township |
May 13, 2008Illegally Download Music, Lose Your House?Most "Free Liberals" support property rights. That said, reasonable, pro-liberty people can disagree over the concept and enforcement of intellectual property. Most fair-minded people also understand the concept of proportionality in punishment. That brings us to Los Angeles where the County Commission recently adopted an ordinance that essentially allows the authorities to seize homes if acts of piracy (illegally downloading music and movies) are found to be committed on the premises. According to the story from Wired, the County board declared that piracy "substantially interferes with the interest of the public in the quality of life and community peace, lawful commerce in the county, property values, and is detrimental to the public health, safety, and welfare of the county's citizens, its businesses and its visitors." Not surprisingly, the regulation was crafted at the urging of the Motion Picture Association of America and the Recording Industry Association of America. Property owners who knowingly permit such activity can also be dinged $1,000 for each counterfeited work produced on the property. The fact is that the Founding Fathers included provisions for patents in the Constitution. They did this because the public at large benefits from new products and technologies. Without patent protection, the incentive for people to innovate is reduced. Is this true for intellectual property? The debate over that issue rages on, but the answers are much less cut-and-dried. It would seem that losing one's house for pirating a movie is more than a little unfair.
Posted by PaulGessing at 08:51 PM
| Comments (0)
May 11, 2008The Truman TransformationEver wonder where today's "imperial presidency" came from? Columnist George Will made the case recently that Harry Truman's presidency should be viewed as a turning point in presidential power. Salient reasons for Will's argument include the undeclared Korean War without Congressional approval and seizure of the nation's steel mills. While historians' approval of Truman's presidency is to be expected as he grew government and increased the power of the presidency, he was among the biggest of big-government Democrats.
Posted by PaulGessing at 11:33 AM
| Comments (0)
April 29, 2008The Thugs of Redford TownshipThe powers that be don't like to be hassled. (H/T Eric Dondero).
Posted by KevinRollins at 09:54 AM
| Comments (0)
April 18, 2008Park Police Thugs Destroy Liberty in the Shadow of JeffersonDo you think the police are really there to protect you? We are told from childhood that the police are our friends and are there for our benefit. While minorities have often seen and experienced otherwise, the rise of youtube and other "democratic" media outlets has shown increasingly how police act like jerks, take our liberties, and treat average people like dirt. One recent example of that recently occurred on Thomas Jefferson's birthday at the Memorial in our Nation's Capital which honors him. Radley Balko discusses the details of this recent example of police abuse at Reason's blog.
Posted by PaulGessing at 03:46 PM
| Comments (1)
April 06, 2008Taxation is Theft. Go for it!Wow! Jan Helfeld’s interview with Harry Reid sure touched off a firestorm of comments. The interview and its reactions illustrate the twin dangers of radicalism and rationalization. Taxation for the most part is theft. (Exceptions are certain user fees and externality taxes.) However, doing without taxation is truly problematic. Without taxes, we might not be able to fund an adequate military, a broad social safety net, astronomical baseball player salaries, or a helium fund for our mighty dirigible fleet. Machiavelli provided the answer: if evil is required to accomplish a greater good, then go for it. But be honest. There is no social contract. We tax because the ends justify the means. Or do they? For national defense I would say the answer is a strong “yes.” Without theft by our own government, we might suffer worse theft by a conqueror. Some social safety net programs might be justifiable as well. Given the choice between robbing the rich to pay for institutions and group homes or letting the severely mentally handicapped go without care, I’ll take robbing the rich. (But if I can dodge this choice through charity, then methinks charity is the better answer.) On the other hand, I am not persuaded that the benefits of a city owned baseball stadium justify theft. Professional baseball is entertainment for people who like boring sports. Let them fund their boring pastime through ticket sales or donations. (Or better yet, let them watch chess tournaments. The players are cheaper and the action is far more intense.) Your values may differ. If you think getting a Major League franchise in your city is so important that it justifies robbing your neighbors – including those of us who hate baseball – then go for it. Just realize that you are committing robbery to support your pastime and take moral responsibility. And don’t be surprised when someone robs you back to pay for that mighty dirigible fleet.
Posted by CarlMilsted at 01:44 PM
| Comments (5)
February 09, 2008283 Nonarchy Pods -- Comin' Right UpNonarchist theorist Roderick Long, philosophy prof at Auburn, is bold. He's so bold that he and 282 other brave souls are petitioning the government – to abolish itself! And be replaced with...nothing. Always one to prefer constructive criticism, Long might want to consider broadening his "demands" out a bit. Why limit his petition to the United States? If Marx can cry out: "Workers of the world, unite!" why can't Long exclaim: "Governments of the world, dissolve!" Of course, all the stockpiles of munitions will need to be disposed of, but why get wrapped around one's axles about such minor details? Long is technically correct when he states, "...few if any of those over whom you claim authority have ever consented to such governance...." After all, did you sign a contract with the government that gives them authority to do what they do? I know I didn't. I'm quite sure I'd like government to do less, a lot less in my dreams. I've even toyed with moving to the stateless area formerly known as Somalia, but I've become accustomed to my inside-the-Beltway oasis and its creature comforts. And, while a time machine has yet to be invented, it might be cool to teleport back a thousand years to Iceland. This way, I can validate the historians who claim to've read the records scratched on bogs that suggest that perhaps that isolated tundra of an island was an anarcho-paradise. Of course, that even Iceland could not maintain its nonarchic utopia might -- just might -- give pause to the Long 283. Or, like the sun rising and setting, we just might accept that some sort of State seems likely for the foreseeable future and beyond. Call that a "constructive contract" if you must, but unless the 283 swells to tens of millions, I'm making book on some semblance of government continuity. And, near as I can tell, 99.9999% seem to accede to the terms, more or less. Still, it seems we should have compassion for the 283. What to do? My modest proposal: Nonarchy Pods. If someone really, really, really wants to opt out of the state's authority to keep the peace, we should let them. They can buy a pod that envelopes them on their property. The pod is impenetrable – nothing comes in or out. They become autonomous little Lichtensteins, except they cannot leave, as the 283 have stated they refuse to abide by the rule of law here amongst the governed. OK, OK, we allow them to trade through a small hole in the pod, I'm feeling generous. And if someone wants to go in the pod, they may, so long as the understand that there is no exit. And now back to our regularly scheduled program, "Roll Back the State." -RC
Posted by RobertCapozzi at 07:08 AM
| Comments (4)
January 07, 2008“Original Intent”: Then, Now and ForeverTwo conversations that freedomistas continue to have are about the “original intent” of the Constitution and the intent of the Union during the Civil War. These issues are intertwined in interesting ways. Let’s stipulate that we really can’t know what the “original intent” of the Framers was. Sometimes, I myself am conflicted in my intent, how about you? Occasionally, I’m quite clear on my intentions, but, frankly, that’s a rare thing. I suspect that’s the human condition, and was the human condition in the 18th century, too. If true, it follows that any one Framer’s intent back then was probably somewhat muddled. Aggregate those muddles, and we get a pool of muddledness. We can read the text of the Constitution, transcripts of the proceedings, written documents from the times commenting on the draft, etc. But, still, we should be humble enough to recognize that there was no such thing as an “original intent.” Which leads to the intentions of the Union in 1860: What was it? It may be no surprise that it was just as muddled in the 19th century as it was in the 18th. This, of course, includes Abraham Lincoln, whom some deify and others demonize. It’s one thing to explode myths about Lincoln, but another to suggest that the Confederacy’s secession was in effect authorized by the Constitution’s (non-existent) original intent. A case can be made, surely, but overstating the case tends to undermine the validity of the assertion. The revisionists go further: The Civil War wasn’t about slavery, or that slavery was one of several disputes. Yes, the record shows that there were other bones of contention. Yet, one need only read the Republican Party’s platforms of 1860 and 1864 that the party, at least, was deeply concerned about the continued institution of slavery. It appears that they viewed the secession of the Confederate states to be a “Rebellion.” In 1860, they said: 7. That the new dogma that the Constitution, of its own force, carries Slavery into any or all of the Territories of the United States, is a dangerous political heresy, at variance with the explicit provisions of that instrument itself, with contemporaneous exposition, and with legislative and judicial precedent; is revolutionary in its tendency, and subversive of the peace and harmony of the country. 8. That the normal condition of all the territory of the United States is that of freedom; That as our Republican fathers, when they had abolished slavery in all our national territory, ordained that "no person should be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law," it becomes our duty, by legislation, whenever such legislation is necessary, to maintain this provision of the Constitution against all attempts to violate it; and we deny the authority of Congress, of a territorial legislature, or of any individuals, to give legal existence to Slavery in any Territory of the United States. 9. That we brand the recent re-opening of the African slave- trade, under the cover of our national flag, aided by perversions of judicial power, as a crime against humanity and a burning shame to our country and age; and we call upon Congress to take prompt and efficient measures for the total and final suppression of that execrable traffic. In 1864, they said: 3. Resolved, That as slavery was the cause, and now constitutes the strength of this Rebellion, and as it must be, always and everywhere, hostile to the principles of Republican Government, justice and the National safety demand its utter and complete extirpation from the soil of the Republic; and that, while we uphold and maintain the acts and proclamations by which the Government, in its own defense, has aimed a deathblow at this gigantic evil, we are in favor, furthermore, of such an amendment to the Constitution, to be made by the people in conformity with its provisions, as shall terminate and forever prohibit the existence of Slavery within the limits of the jurisdiction of the United States. There are a number of ways to look at any issue. We should take great care when asserting that we know the one truth. -RC
Posted by RobertCapozzi at 06:19 AM
| Comments (0)
August 27, 2007Alberto Gonzales Steps DownIn case you haven't already heard, Gonzales stepped down as US Attorney General today. It is hard to overstate just how poorly he has performed his job of "upholding and protecting the United States Constitution." For many in the media and the Democratic Party, Gonzales's legacy will be the US Attorney scandal which may or may not have had real importance for the Republic. What does matter and is directly relevant to our current situation is his prominent role in developing the Administration's positions on torture and domestic spying. There's no doubt his legacy will be "dismal," but it is important he be remembered for the really outrageous behavior, not just the politically-motivated attorney scandal.
Posted by PaulGessing at 11:59 PM
| Comments (0)
April 09, 2007Orwell updateThanks to Andrew Sullivan for calling attention to the plight of Professor Walter Murphy, a former Marine, critic of Roe versus Wade, and a supporter of the Alito nomination. In a chilling example of how the war on terror is also a war on dissent, Professor Murphy found himself on the no-fly list and was told it likely was because he give speeches critical of Bush. Here is the story in Professor Murphy's own words: "When I tried to use the curb-side check in at the Sunport, I was denied a boarding pass because I was on the Terrorist Watch list. I was instructed to go inside and talk to a clerk. At this point, I should note that I am not only the McCormick Professor of Jurisprudence (emeritus) but also a retired Marine colonel. I fought in the Korean War as a young lieutenant, was wounded, and decorated for heroism. I remained a professional soldier for more than five years and then accepted a commission as a reserve office, serving for an additional 19 years." "I presented my credentials from the Marine Corps to a very polite clerk for American Airlines. One of the two people to whom I talked asked a question and offered a frightening comment: "Have you been in any peace marches? We ban a lot of people from flying because of that." I explained that I had not so marched but had, in September, 2006, given a lecture at Princeton, televised and put on the Web, highly critical of George Bush for his many violations of the Constitution. "That'll do it," the man said. " "After carefully examining my credentials, the clerk asked if he could take them to TSA officials. I agreed. He returned about ten minutes later and said I could have a boarding pass, but added: "I must warn you, they=re going to ransack your luggage." On my return flight, I had no problem with obtaining a boarding pass, but my luggage was "lost." Airlines do lose a lot of luggage and this "loss" could have been a mere coincidence. In light of previous events, however, I'm a tad skeptical." "I confess to having been furious that any American citizen would be singled out for governmental harassment because he or she criticized any elected official, Democrat or Republican. That harassment is, in and of itself, a flagrant violation not only of the First Amendment but also of our entire scheme of constitutional government. This effort to punish a critic states my lecture's argument far more eloquently and forcefully than I ever could. Further, that an administration headed by two men who had "had other priorities" than to risk their own lives when their turn to fight for their country came up, should brand as a threat to the United States a person who did not run away but stood up and fought for his country and was wounded in battle, goes beyond the outrageous. Although less lethal, it is of the same evil ilk as punishing Ambassador Joseph Wilson for criticizing Bush's false claims by "outing" his wife, Valerie Plaime, thereby putting at risk her life as well as the lives of many people with whom she had had contact as an agent of the CIA. ..." "I have a personal stake here, but so do all Americans who take their political system seriously. Thus I hope you and your colleagues will take some positive action to bring the Administration's conduct to the attention of a far larger, and more influential, audience than I could hope to reach. "
Posted by NormSingleton at 08:46 PM
| Comments (0)
March 07, 2007State Secrets and National SecurityBelow is a petition which is being submitted to Congress on behalf of Liberty Coalition (of which I serve as communications director) and other organizations. The petition points to the real problem that we have been facing where the executive branch has been repeatedly making tactical moves to prevent Congress from providing meaningful oversight of the activities of the federal government. In the case of FBI whistleblower Sibel Edmonds, it sounds as though she may have damning evidence of criminal behavior within the US goverment, as well as information which could shed more light on the 9/11 attacks. While her own travails as a whisltleblower provide a reason for concern, the out-of-control behavior by federal public servants is especially troubling. Please read below and see what you think. -- KDR *** To: The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform A Petition to require public hearings by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform into confirmed reports by FBI Whistleblower Sibel Edmonds of wrongdoing, criminal activities, cover-ups against the security and interests of the United States and its citizenry, and the erroneous use of the State Secrets Privilege to shut down all court proceedings in her case. In March 2002 the Department of Justice’s Office of the Inspector General (DOJ-IG) began its investigation of Ms. Edmonds’ reports. In June 2002, in at least two unclassified Senate briefings, FBI officials confirmed the validity of Ms. Edmonds reports; however, in May 2004 Attorney General Ashcroft retroactively classified information from these briefings and gagged the Congress, preventing further investigation. Edmonds filed a whistleblower lawsuit against the Department of Justice, but the government successfully argued that the state secrets privilege was an absolute bar to her suit going forward. She was even barred from the courtroom during the argument of her appeal! The Supreme Court declined to review the case. The government's invocation of the state secrets privilege in a motion to dismiss her case contradicts the core idea of judicial review and essentially allows the Executive Branch to dictate to the federal courts what cases they can and can’t hear. OMB Watch Electronic Privacy Information Center (EPIC) American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) National Coalition against Censorship Bill of Rights Defense Committee (BORDC) National Security Whistleblowers Coalition Liberty Coalition National Whistleblower Center Open the Government .Org U.S.-Armenian Public Affairs Committee (USAPAC) Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington (CREW) Citizen Outreach Concerned Foreign Service Officers Fairfax County Privacy Council Federal Hispanic Law Enforcement Officers Association Government Accountability Project (GAP) National Air Disaster Alliance/Foundation Ohio Taxpayers Association & OTA Foundation
September 11th Advocates Veterans Affairs Whistleblowers Coalition (VAWBC) U.S. Bill of Rights Foundation (USBOR) Privacy Activism The Multiracial Activists, The New Grady Coalition
Posted by KevinRollins at 11:25 AM
| Comments (0)
December 29, 2006The Secretive Execution of Saddam HusseinWe wait in anticipation of the demise of our Great Enemy. The new Iraqi government is set to execute Saddam Hussein, dictator and villain, for his crimes against the people of Iraq. To the US Government, it appears as a victory. Finally, the man we have hated and our government has pursued since the first Gulf War, will pay for defying the US and doing unspeakable things to innocent people. It vindicates our war -- we have removed a threat in the Middle East and brought democracy to an oppressed people. But, have we done good? Have we furthered justice? Have we brought peace? This execution suggests not. We don’t know when he will be executed. Whether it is for security reasons (to protect those who will carry it out), or for strategic reasons (to confuse those who would take action in protest of the execution), or for bureaucratic reasons (because executing people is not handled in a precise and scheduled manner by the government), it does not speak well for the Iraqi government’s transparency and credibility as an institution committed to honesty and justice. Justice is certainly a fuzzy term. But, if one uses a certain definition, one cannot criticize and compare if the definition changes between cases. So, we must fix one as “our” definition of justice. Saddam had secret trials and secret executions. His raison d’etre was unknown. But, so are the methods and practices of the current Iraqi government, at least to us. We do not know that it is more just than the previous administration. On the second count, we cannot say that Iraq is more peaceful. Certainly, the killing is no longer limited to the depraved actions of the state. But now, death squads and suicide bombers share in the terror. What is the net casualty rate? Saddam’s execution should not hang among our laurels, but remind us of how much our government has failed in this disastrous folly. -- KDR
Posted by KevinRollins at 12:23 AM
| Comments (1)
September 30, 2006The Case of Cory MayeIronically, while the Kelo decision has made Americans more aware than ever of the need to protect their homes from greedy government officials and developers, the philosopher that your home is your castle is under attack by other government officials -- specifically the police. Radley Balko has been doing tremendous work to expose the militarization of police forces around the country and the general disregard these more militaristic tactics show for not only the property, but the lives of average Americans.
Posted by PaulGessing at 10:46 AM
| Comments (0)
|
Free-for-all (frfr-ôl) -- n. A disorderly fight, argument, or competition in which everyone present participates.
If you enjoy our site or our print publication, please consider making a contribution today! SIMPLE AD ERROR VIEW COUNT NOT UPDATED
Return to the Free Liberal Homepage
About the Free Liberal The Free Liberal is an independent journal of transpartisan thought. The views expressed herein are those of the writers individually and not necessarily those of the Free Liberal, the Center for Liberty and Community, or its board of directors. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||