A Better World
The Job of President
Not Playing It Safe in Uganda
Escaping the State?
"Both our laws and our highest ideals"
Obama -- Beacon of Hope?
Lions for Lambs
Lost Lesson of Thanksgiving
Woodstock > Vietnam as Yin > Yang
Last Night's Republican Debate
The Rub on Vick
Aaron Russo, RIP
The Simpsons as Free Liberal Mythology?
Notes on Sicko
Greenberg on Immigration
Someone in cable "news" has a clue
Us (Us Us Us Us), and Them (Them Them Them)....
Virginia Tech Every Day
Ending Poverty: What Works?
Amazing Grace Review
Amazing Grace
Let Me In--Recovery from Autism is Possible!
Ron Paul Running for Prez!
Left-Libertarians and workers of the world unite!
On the Passing of Milton Friedman
300 million people
Institute for Justice -- A Pro-Freedom Gem
Global Family and Day of Peace Day or where is Tom Lehrer when you really need him!
A failure to communicate
The Tree Climbing Actress
About Free For All
Digg Away!
Eric Dondero and
The Free Liberal
Changing of the Guard
Bob Capozzi, Senior Editor
Corporate State and Medicine
Testing, 1,2,3...
Introducing Free For All -- The Free Liberal Blog
Pre-launch Testing
Economics
The Future of Tax Reform
What Does Barack Obama Know?
The Swimming Brits
Enivornmentalism Turns Against Itself *UPDATED*
Milton Friedman: Singlehandedly responsible for libertarianism
Wal Mart Katrina Response Illustrates Government's Failure
Vote for Freedom
Warmongering vs. Socialism
Fed to Blame?
Undo the Obstacles to the Manifestation of Comparative Advantage
The Mercantilist Impulse
Bottoms Up
Boudreaux on the Falling Dollar
Liberty Dollars: What's the Big Deal?
Colorado Residents Missing Rebates
Club for Growth Assessment of Ron Paul: Fair or Hatchet Job?
What is Libertarian Paternalism?
Huckabee's Smoking Ban
Wall Street's Nanny
Ron Paul and Bernanke
Private Dollars Lead New Orleans Recovery
No Magic Wand
Whole Foods, Monopolist?
The Inflation Tax
Politically Incorrect and proud of it
The great inflation cover-up
The biggest lies told by the state
Beckham: Not About the Money
The Matter of $1
Tyler Cowen Calls for Carbon Tax
Trans-Texas Corridor and Sovreignty
A Desire Named Streetcar
Pre-K in the Womb?
Does the Dear Leader Understand Incentives?
Too High? Why so Low?
Uncle Sam: worse than Enron
Taxaphobia?
10 Worst Government Programs
Problems with geoanarchism?
Assume We Do
Education
Find out if you could be on Leno's "Jaywalking"
Vouchers defeated in Utah
A Free Market in Education?
Energy
Enivornmentalism Turns Against Itself *UPDATED*
Calculating the Cost of a Carbon Tax
The Price of Gas, Again
Problem Already Solved?
Life After the Oil Crash 4
Life After the Oil Crash 3
Life After the Oil Crash 2
Life After the Oil Crash
Europe
Sticking it to the Welfare State
Austrian Darkness & EU Light
Events
DEBATE: How Much to Spend on Climate Change?
“Who Cares About Anarchy When You Can Have Limited Government?”
Is Extremism a Virtue?
Is Extremism a Virtue?
It’s All Opportunism
"Immigration reform and its challenges" -- event this Wednesday
Robert Fuller Event at Busboys and Poets
Right Against War with Iran
Foreign Policy
American Conservative Defense Alliance: Fighting the War Party
Jon Stewart Takes on AIPAC
Democracies and War
Do Muslims Really Hate Us?
The Lies Have It
Burying Hitler
Israel: NIE Report Could Spark War
Bomb Iran, bomb, bomb, Iran
Why did libertarians support the war?
John Howard Deserved to Lose
A Legacy of Losing: JFK, Obama and Viet Nam
Disagreeing with Ron Paul
Another great, but obscure anti-war classic
Iraq = Vietnam?
Bush: President for Life?
Response to Randy Barnett
The Push to Keep Us in Iraq
Bizarro Libertarianism
The CIA: Still evil after all these years
Reason author Clueless on libertarian foreign policy
USS Liberty
Immigration
Illegal Immigration and Moral Turpitude
Immigration and Polls
Ron Paul Ad Not What I'm Donating For
Immigration: Global Warming on the right
Republicans: Again the Stupid Party
Individualist Values
Tabarrok on Living Under Authoritarian Regimes
Obama is Right on Leviticus
Dancing and the Law
Frank Talk About Irony
Beltway Libertarians a Sad Tale
Undercutting Collectivist Thinking, One Award at a Time
Is Your Doctor/Lawyer/Accountant Endangering Your Privacy?
Politicians Live by One Set of Rules, We Live by Another
Early Retirement = Unpatriotic?
Free to be Fatty
US, Britian Ethnically Cleanse Diego Garcia
Lost
Libertarianism at Watership Down
McCain Should Have Been at Woodstock
Libertarian Paternalism?
Do we serve the state or does the state serve us?
The Love of Power vs. Power of Love
Hey Hillary (and the rest of the nicotine Nazis)
A bad argument for ending prohibition
Another great Libertarian song
Latest Bush Concept: Loyalty Day!
Workers of the world unite and smash the state!
Reps. Rangel and Flake agree???
Libertarian horror
New Mexico Property Owners Finally Protecte
New Mexico Becomes 11th State to Adopt Medical Marijuana
Big Government Conservatives
Dixie Chicks Among Esteemed Outlaws
How to Disable RFID Chips in Your New Passport
Muhammad Ali's Mixed Legacy
Pro-peace, Pro-slavery?
Sexy Nurses Illegal?
Important new book
Bipartisan thuggery
Re: Bad idea dead
Milton Friedman's greatest accomplishment
Remember, Remember
Remember, Remember,
re: Rendering unto Caesar
Rendering unto Caesar
Enough to make any libertarian (or red-blooded Ayn Rand fan) drool.
Gangster Politicians
Re: Reform the LP
Is Liberty on the March, Backwards???
Rockin in the Free World
Snakes on a Plane
"Libertarians" for the draft?
Killing the Death Tax: A Liberal's View
Re: the Pesky Section 8
Destroying Individual Virtue
Medical Freedom
Crowding Out the Right Prescription?
CATO versus Michael Moore
WWE versus the state: round II
Brave New World Update
Brave New World Update
Good News in the War on Drugs
Invasion of the Body Snatchers?
The Marginal Benefit of Health Care
Who's Afraid of Frankenstein?
Natural Rights
Using the Second Amendment as Intended
Thought Crimes and Misdemeanors
Blast from the Past
No Rights?
Freedom of Speech...yeah, right
Korean Hostage Deal Versus Religious Liberty
Speaking of Marijuana and Al Gore III
Defending Al Gore III
The Once and Future Republic of Vermont
Superbowl Gambling and Silly Laws
Atoms in the Here and Now
The Last Straw for Bush
Government Goons Murder Puppies!
Hollywood Just Doesn't Get It
Mr. Libertarian
Thinking about Bob thinking about Darfur
Go see Sophie Scholl-The Final Days
Ron Paul, Big-Government Believer?
Offensive and Intolerable
A Priori Anarchists
Am I a Utilitarian?
Photos
Free Liberals at the National Taxpayers Union Conference
Politics
The Power of Mumpower
Turbett on Bill O'Reilly's Fast and Loose Politics
Bob Barr Gives Measured Response to Fannie Freddie Crisis
Unfit for Office?
Say you want a r3VOLution?
Nuanced to Death
Understanding Democracy
Goodbye Raymond Burke
"...in the home."
2A, Kelo and Federalism
Move Over, Somalia
Back to Square One
The Most Important Question
Veepstakes, Life and Choice
Obama/Casey
Cross Purposes
Richardson
Some voters have always thrown away their votes...
Splitting the Baby
Barr/Paul ticket still in the cards?!
Bob Barr and the PATRIOT Act
Start of Something Big?
Libertarians in Denver
Presidential Cult?
Obama: Pot Smokers' Choice?
Ron Paul #1 on Amazon
Undercutting Collectivist Thinking, One Award at a Time
Enivornmentalism Turns Against Itself *UPDATED*
Hillary Hung On
Obama Between the Extremes of Excess and . . . Excess?
Obama under Attack over Patriotism at Debate
Hillary vs. McCain Faux Pas: Which Matters More?
You Libertarian Relativist, You
Forget Iceland 1000 AD. How's About Switzerland Now?
Mad Hatter Daze
Taxing v. Killing Peasants
Paying for It
Obama: The Best Antiwar Option Left
Not So Fast
Change in DC without "Debaathification?"
09: Cause for Optimism?
John McCain: Unfit to Lead
Is The Path to Liberty to the North?
Obama Can Fix America's Image
Ba-Bye, Rudy and Fred
Work for a Corporation, Democrats Say
Camelot Gathers 'Round
Petraeus '12?
Asymmetrical Information
Endorsements
Giving Credit Where It Is Due
Exploding Myths
Running and Hiding
The OTHER Open Letter
Racist Words vs. Racist Deeds
Haters As Cowards
Ron Paul Isn't a Racist
Thoughts on New Hampshire
Fox News, Ron Paul and Conservatives
Challengers from the Mainstream
Love and Hate, Iowa Style
[Blank] Need Not Apply
Welcome to 08
Go Home, Ron Paul!
Who Would Reagan Vote For?
Huckabee: The Last Whig
This is getting INTERESTING!
Ron Paul Raises Record Cash
Rodney King: Call Your Office
Ron Paul v. the Beltway Libertarians
Wonderful Ron Paul Article in Washington Post
Paranoia, self destroyer
Republican Rehab
"Healthy" State Seeking Perfection?
Jay Leno and Ron Paul
Missing Warren G. Harding
Ron Paul on PBS NewsHour
Paul Jacob Indicted
Heresies Out Loud
"Don't Tase Me, Bro"
Never Underestimate the “Power” of Denial
Time for fascism
Strippers for Ron Paul on Tucker
Giuliani's Dangerous Bluster
The Joys of Transpartisanship
Is Hillary a Neocon?
Ron Paul and the Libertarian National Convention
Talk to those we don't agree with? Heaven Forbid!
NY Times on Ron Paul
On the "Edge"
Citizen's Dividend and Health Insurance
The Chasm of Abstraction
In a free market...
Sheehan for Congress?
Closed-source Ames straw poll needs paper ballots
The Spy Who Didn't Love Me
More on Iowa, Ron Paul
For peace and trust can win the day, despite of all your losing.
Iowans for Tax Relief But Not Ron Paul
Ron Paul Making Waves on the Net
Human "Capital"?
Ron Paul on the Daily Show w/ Jon Stewart
Why do libertarians eat their own?
Did Rudy "Win"?
Fly in the Ointment?
Stepping In It
Ron Paul's Goldwater Moment
New Media and Mike Gravel
The GOP's Rodney Dangerfield
Strange Bedfellows
Never turn your back on the family
David Brooks is Wrong
Giuliani and the Price of Bread
Who says politicians are stupid?
Expanding the welfare state for fun and profit
The loyal opposition
Dispatches from Bizaroworld
If you only buy one book by a Presidential candidate this year
Bush and Chavez: A Marriage Made in Hell
Does War Make Presidents Great?
George Will on Ron Paul
The on again, off again saga of global climate change
My favorite bureaucrat
Bruce Bartlett Takes a Hatchet to the Libertarian Party (and other third parties as well)
Jon Stewart and the 2006 Election
Will Triumphant Democrats Push Liberalism or Socialism?
More on Libertarian Democrats
Libertarian Democrats: NOT
Libertarian-Democrats?
Re: the cult of the state
Reform the LP?
The Vitiated Center
Workers of the world unite...for liberty
The Republicans' secret weapon
Best idea I've heard all week
The "unfree" liberal
Moderation Without Meaning?
Voter Participation is Not Paramount
Jon Stewart: Enemy of Democracy?
Political Whores Needed?
The Milsted Strategy
Feingold's predecessor
More thoughts on Darfur
The Other Enemy of Free Enterprise
I'm a John Mackey Libertarian
Hillary the failure
Five excuses cover all government errors
GOP war on the Family
Sure to be Unpopular
Partisan Talk Show Hosts
Oppose a personality cult? You're a leftist!
Cheney and Spin
Not Very Open-Minded, Not Very Transpartisan
You Gotta Love Lawyers
Is Gore A Civil Libertarian?
Corruption and Benefit
Abramoff -- Seducer?
Third Party Chances
Rule of Law
Taking Olbermann and Obama to Task for FISA Support
Illegally Download Music, Lose Your House?
The Truman Transformation
The Thugs of Redford Township
Park Police Thugs Destroy Liberty in the Shadow of Jefferson
Taxation is Theft. Go for it!
283 Nonarchy Pods -- Comin' Right Up
“Original Intent”: Then, Now and Forever
Alberto Gonzales Steps Down
Orwell update
State Secrets and National Security
The Secretive Execution of Saddam Hussein
The Case of Cory Maye
TFL Update
Moving my Blogging
Publish JDM!
Stumbling on Buddha
The Free Liberal -- Expanding its Presence Nationwide
Featured on the Free Liberal
The Freedomnista Movement
Honoring Kent Snyder
Kent Snyder: Hail and Farewell
Personally, I kinda want to slay the dragon...Let's Get to Work
Ron Paul r(EVOL)tionary triumphs
Happy Birthday Paul Jacob!
Lew Rockwell?
Is the Horse Dead?
Despicable Behavior
The L Word
Is the Libertarian Party worth the fight?
A Dear Friend Lost
We broke it, we bought it?
Fall reading
The Nazi Welfare State
Notes from the Parlor Game
Hands held high
quote of the month
Take a few minutes
See Ron Paul Wednesday
Quote of the week
Ron Paul Revolution
Mises Media
Read two books
Left and Right
Cowen’s “Package Deal”
The Movement
Theory of Knowledge
Tectonic Ch Ch Ch Changes
Logical Atomism and Truth Claims
The Transitory Nature of Partisan Hacks
Don't Quote Me on that...
The Seen and the Unseen
Theory and Consequences
If a Tree Falls in the Woods…
Transpartisanship
Mob Mentality in the Ron Paul Revolution?
Agreeing with Jonah Goldberg -- Twice!
Ron Paul supporter spreading democracy
from Iraq
Polarized Too Extreme
Very Silly
Rush's Deal
Environmentally Friendly Bombs
Love, A is A style
Firefly is returning
Miss Bimbo isn't Shakespeare
Hillary the Robot (at SOTU)
For the Children
Good enough for government work
I Know An Old Lady...
Brave New World Update
What's in a name?
Anti-Terror Extortion?
Greatest Prank Ever
The Purity of Being Broke?
Ayn Rand Greeting Cards
Achewood on Hating America and Anarchy
War on Drugs
Are you going to arrest me, Governor Romney?
State Medical Marijuana Laws Under Attack in New Mexico
The Right Kind of Flip-Flopping
55 Years for Weed?
War on Terror
Who will watch the Watch List
Orwell update
Hornberger Takes on the Wall Street Journal
Dilbert Author Skewers Ahmadinejad Visit Panic (graphic language)
Harry Potter's alright, but make mine Buffy
Bush Backs Down on Torture
If Big Brother can make it there...
Terror debate
Ron Paul-Giuliani Exchange on War
Ron Paul Stands Up for Reality in Republican Debate
Pentagon Lies Exposed Today
Peace Movement Must Take on AIPAC
Is Cheney Living in an Alternate Universe?
Orwell update
The Case Against War
4 Terror Plots Thwarted?
The Feingold Option
Can Congress Stop the War?
Ahmadinejad and Bush: Something in Common
90% of Iraqis "We Were Better off Under Saddam"
Libertarian Warmongers?
The Lessons of Vietnam?
Hint for Democrats: Protect Whistleblowers
Pat Tillman's Birthday
Keith Olbermann
It is happening here
9--11 and cult of the omnipotent state
Osama bin Laden as Cultural Icon
The importance of foreign policy
More on Israel's Aggression in Lebanon
What is going on in Lebanon/Israel?
Prominent Neo-Con: Suspend Constitution!
The WTC Memorial and Admissions Fees
Ann Coulter is insane
The Truth Will get you in Trouble
Cartoon Violence
Conspiracy Theory Conspiracies
McCain on Torture
Comments
They don't want him in the debate because he is the only one telling the truth about how terrible our government is. Our government owns the media...isn't this just proof? BOYCOTT FOX and all of their sponsors! Tell your newscorp stock immediately and hit them where it hurts!
Posted by: Deborah Ward | December 31, 2007 01:23 AM
IF another network wanted to have better ratings on the night of Jan 6th and was willing to give Ron Paul the platform, here's what I suggest they do.
Monitor the questions asked by Chris Wallace and then ask RP the same questions.
Millions will tune in to see Ron Paul, I assure you. Plus, they can pan outside the venue where the Iraqi-Warmongers Back-Slapping Forum is being held and see the thousands of Paul supporters holding a rally.
The next day, take the questions and post a montage of all the answers given by the WAR-5 group plus Ron Paul's and post it on YouTube and watch the hits skyrocket. You'll have 5 answers the same and only one dissenting point of view. Want to guess who the dissenter will be?
Any takers? CNN? MSNBC? NPR? maybe C-Span? Come on guys, don't be bashful.
Posted by: Larry in SC | December 31, 2007 01:24 AM
Excellent idea Larry, except I'm afraid all of the media are in bed together so I doubt there will be any takers.
If anyone hasn't seen it yet, go to youtube and search for the video of Ralph Nader being excluded, and almost arrested, for trying to enter the debates in 2000. It's sickening how corrupt our system is.
It's time to take our country back people. We are being manipulated beyond belief. I can't believe this is America. Watch the video and I think you will agree.
Also, watch 'Outfoxed' about Rupert Murdoch and Fox News. Spread it to everyone you know, they don't deserve to be on the "tell-a-vision."
Posted by: J Hall | December 31, 2007 02:08 AM
This is great news for Ron Paul. Fox News has destroyed any shred of credibility they might have had left as a reliable news organization. If they cave in, and allow Ron into the debate, it'll only be because they're afraid of what it'll do to the value of the company's stock, their ad revenue, and their ratings for the debate. What's more, Ron Paul will only gain from this. If they keep him out, people will start to wonder why -- and when they look at what Ron Paul has to say, they'll find it to be reasonable and will become supporters. Those who aren't supporters will be galvanized and energized by the establishment media's attempt to silence him. New Hampshire voters will be outraged by Fox's insult to paint them as being too stupid to listen to the candidates and make up the own minds.
If you want to see a funny satire on the president, the mainstream media, and the
president, watch this YouTube music video. It features horror movie
veteran, Reggie Bannister (Phantasm, Wishmaster, Bubba Ho-tep) as the
President of the U.S. facing a crisis ("zombie terrorist attack").
It's an excerpt from the new international award-winning zombie rock
musical feature film, "Song of the Dead." The filmmaker, Chip Gubera,
is giving a share of his revenue from DVD sales to the Ron Paul
campaign. Go to:
Ron Paul is taking over both the real world and the virtual world.
That's because he's the only presidential candidate in perhaps the
last 100 years to bring honest, integrity, and authenticity to the
presidential race. Go to:
http://youtube.com/watch?v=qQmkkoxSKYw
Posted by: mketcher | December 31, 2007 02:08 AM
If one of the networks did do something like that they would make $$$$.
Why not, perhaps we need to do some e-mailing.
Posted by: Paul T | December 31, 2007 02:37 AM
You say toe-may-to, I say toh-mah-toe- either way, it's rotten tomatoes for FOX News. Their 'Roundtable' is neither fair nor balanced, and should count as a paid political advertisement, since they don't even go through the motions of a sham process of exclusion. No matter how you slice it, this rotten tomatoe of a 'forum' (or whatever you wish to perform semantic gymnastics in calling it) excludes Ron Paul, while including Fred Thompson, Rudy Giuliani and John McCain- candidates who are statistically polling even with or below Dr. Paul in New Hampshire. Apparently FOX merely wants a Republican Neo-Con love-In rather than a real honest discussion about issues that includes ALL the legitimate candidates. Just because you disagree with someone doesn't delegitimize their candidacy.
Look for a post-'forum' spin telling us how great Rudy did (they ALWAYS say that even when he stinks up the room, right Frank Luntz?), they'll talk about how folksy and down-to-earth Mike Huckabee is (Ignoring his numerous faux pas and hateful rhetoric- even if delivered in a 'folksy' manner), how 'strong' John McCain sounded (have to push him- Rupert Murdoch and Roger Ailes are both good buddies with all the defense contractors making BILLIONS on this insane war!), and surely they will talk about how 'Presidential' Fred Thompson appeared (amazing he's still running- is he still running?).
Overall, It's amazing that anyone takes FOX News seriously anymore, seeing how they don't even try to hide their bias, and decry the immorality of American culture just before introducing the next 'spring break gone wild' videos for the umpteenth time.
Gee... Ron Paul doesn't look so 'kooky' when you look at him next to FOX News coverage of the Presidential race!
xtrabiggg
+++++++++++++++++++++=
Posted by: xtrabiggg | December 31, 2007 03:06 AM
The dollar slid across the board on Friday as data showing a 9 percent decline in sales of new U.S. homes last month heightened concern about the economy, putting the greenback on track for its worst week in more than a year.
The housing report, which was weaker than economists had expected, also bolstered the case for more Federal Reserve interest rate cuts in 2008. Earlier this week, the S&P/Case-Shiller index showed a record decline in U.S. home prices in October.
This is what's happening to YOUR house. All the 'money' and 'equity' you thought you had saved - eliminated! The equity through falling house prices - and the money because we are DEBASING OUR CURRENCY. That low fed rate you're reading about gets created by printing money and lending it to people. With more money, the money YOU have is worth LESS. So your money is worth less and your property is worth less - where can you turn to keep ahead of inflation? I think you BETTER turn to Dr. Paul. He's the ONLY one running that has a HOPE of being able to deal with this.
Also please remember this wa the ONLY thing my post was about.
Posted by: Louis Nardozi | December 31, 2007 03:16 AM
Let your voice be heard....Send an email
To Whom it may Concern,
I am writing to express my disappointment and displeasure upon discovering Dr. Ron Paul will be excluded from the New Hampshire Debates. Dr. Paul has placed #1 among Republicans AND Democrats at AOL's spam-proof poll. Dr. Paul LEADS ALL Republican candidates in fund raising this quarter. Dr. Paul is tied for third place in IOWA. Dr. Paul's support is known to be great among Independents, former Republicans and Democrats. Surely these people deserve to have their candidate heard! Dr. Paul Is the MOST searched for candidate on the internet. The exclusion of Dr. Paul from these debates would be for me the final convincing piece of evidence that we the American citizens are no longer in control of our destiny. Once the process to file FEDERAL complaints via the FCC is automated, you may expect a flood of letters to your affiliate stations stating FOX affiliates are NOT acting in the public interest.
v/r
Comments@foxnews.com, AmericasNewsroom@foxnews.com,
Beltway@foxnews.com, Myword@foxnews.com,
Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com, Bullsandbears@foxnews.com,
Cash@foxnews.com, Cavuto@foxnews.com,
Fncimag@foxnews.com, Forbes@foxnews.com,
Friends@foxnews.com, Feedback@foxnews.com,
Jamie@foxnews.com, Fncspecials@foxnews.com,
FNS@foxnews.com, Newswatch@foxnews.com,
Foxreport@foxnews.com, Atlarge@foxnews.com,
Hannityandcolmes@foxnews.com, Heartland@foxnews.com,
JER@foxnews.com, Lineup@foxnews.com,
Martha@foxnews.com, Ontherecord@foxnews.com,
Oreilly@foxnews.com, Redeye@foxnews.com,
Special@foxnews.com, Studiob@foxnews.com,
Cavuto@foxnews.com, Hemmer@foxnews.com, colonelscorner@foxnews.com, Fatherjonathan@foxnews.com, Drmanny@foxnews.com, Lisonlaw@foxnews.com, Housecall@foxnews.com
1. list of fox sponsors
Crest Whitestrips & Dawn (both Proctor & Gamble) 513-983-1100
• Delphi (Driving Products) 1.888.809.9800
• Mercedes Benz 1-800-367-6372
• Comcast 1-800-COMCAST
• Subaru 1-800-782-2783
• GMC Suv’s 1-800-551-4123
• Best Buy 1-888-237-8289
• Travelocity 1 888.872.8356
• Capzasin 1 (423) 822-5020
• New Phase
• Orbitz 1-888-656-4546
• Ditech.com 1-800-DITECH-3
• eloan.com (415) 786-3317
• Toyota 1 800-331-4331
• Centrum (Wyeth) 1-800-322-3129
• Nextel (aka Sprint)1-800-639-6111
• Vehix.com 1.866.698.3449
• Gold Bond (Chattum) 423-821-4571
• Aspercreme ” ”
• webmd.com via email or webmd.com via other (212) 624-3700
• American Express 1-877-877-0987, 1-800-525-3355
• Holiday Inn Express 1 800-315-2621
• M Professional unk
• priceline.com 1-800-774-2354
• L. L. Bean 1-800-441-7513
• Jet Dry (Dishwasher Products) 1-800-820-8939
Chemistry (Matchmaking Web Site)
Bankrate.com (Mortgages)
Cars Direct.com
Posted by: Robert McLoughlin | December 31, 2007 06:20 AM
I'll be surprised if he doesn't hit 21 million by midnight tonight.
It's not that several dozen supporters are donating tens of thousands, but rather tens of thousands of fans are donating several dozens.
It's like he's putting on a Rock Concert and the tickets are selling out fast!
Posted by: Gregory Richards | December 31, 2007 07:01 AM
I've written my letter of protest to Fox News. The irony is that they call their news station "fair and balanced". The ONLY balance they have is Judge Napolitano. I highly recommend his book "A Nation of Sheep". When you buy it and realize that the message he is sending parallels Ron Paul, take a gander at the back of the book where the Fox News staff appear to have been forced to leave comments. They Hypocrisy of Sean Hannity,Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh just goes hand in hand with everything Fox news is about. What they are about is forcing their agenda down our throat. Using fear tactic to control the "sheep" and making sure that there is no other voice but theirs --which results in having a "WAR Round Table" and leaving out the one man who speaks of Peace. They probably would have thrown Gandhi & Martin Luther King off their panel too!! I'd love to see what Stock shares the people at Fox News own. Who is making money off this war? Keep on Sheeping on People! WAKE UP AMERICA!
Posted by: Gigi Bowman | December 31, 2007 07:46 AM
Why would another network do anything differently than Fox News?
Ron Paul is not polling well. Forum sponsors and networks want to narrow the field to the top tier. Paul is not in that tier. There is going to be a push from now on to limit the number of speakers in a forum.
CNN would not act differently from FOX.
Posted by: Tim Peck | December 31, 2007 07:47 AM
Tim are you stupid? Ron Paul is polling higher than Thompson or Giuliani in NH. and has raised more money. Get it together and realize that it doesn't add up... My God man.
Posted by: Thurman Munson | December 31, 2007 07:54 AM
and oh yeah.... that's Thompson AND Giuliani.
Posted by: Thurman Munson | December 31, 2007 07:57 AM
Can you imagine why Tim?
Open your eyes SHeeple!!
Watch this video to see why CNN sells War! Then take a gander why Rupert Murdoch sells it even harder. Who owns who? We have a bunch of Corporate Candidates forced down our throats and people like YOU back them by listing to these idiotic polls!
Being an organizer for New York State Ron Paul Meet-up....I've just had to go through the delegate process. Did you know that 80% of Ron Paul supporters have recently SWITCHED from another party as late as October 12th. DO YOU THINK ANYONE IS POLLING THESE PEOPLE in the Republican Party????????
http://www.brasschecktv.com/page/240.html
Posted by: Gigi | December 31, 2007 08:03 AM
It's growing increasingly apparent that faux news is getting contributions from the military industry (or the administration) (or someone). It doesn't make sense why they wouldn't put the biggest fundraiser on their show if this were not the case. Media is a business, and for this to pay off for fox... well just think about it!!
Posted by: Tony | December 31, 2007 09:14 AM
I am overjoyed that Ron Paul is to be excluded. Elvis, the Beatles, etc. all massively increased their popularity when the power structure tried to resist their influence. The new campaign should be on "What candidate does the media not want you to see?"
Posted by: Fazsha | December 31, 2007 10:18 AM
January 17th we will show them who can go home and who will stay in till the end. The new massive fundraising that will even shock Ron Paul!!! With our neat first results people will be willing to donate more then ever before! Embrace yourselves people!
Posted by: www.benjaminsforpaul.com | December 31, 2007 10:35 AM
I am a Conservative that supported this "war on Terror". That is, until the good Dr. opened my eyes to what is really happening.
I want to say that I am now a recovering Rush Limbaugh, Sean Hannity, Fox News addict.
I no longer desire or need any of those anymore.
Thanks Dr. Paul!
Posted by: mnjrupp | December 31, 2007 11:09 AM
He's raised more money than GOD and is much higher in the polls in NH than Fred.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119906159792258573.html?mod=googlenews_wsj
Posted by: NH | December 31, 2007 11:11 AM
Democracy is dead. Watching how unfair the media has been to Dr. Paul just convinces me I'm right when I think the elections are rigged, as certainly the media is....
Posted by: Mark from Phoenix | December 31, 2007 12:15 PM
Posted by: Thurman Munson:
"Can you imagine why Tim? Open your eyes SHeeple!!"
Very intelligent response; even if 'ad hominem.' You surpass yourself.
Here are the relevant polls:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/us/republican_presidential_nomination-192.html
Posted by: Tim Peck | December 31, 2007 08:22 PM
Well, here we are at 3:30 AM still working the web to help the good Doctor win in Nov. and it seems that Mr. Cullen, the GOP chair in NH who was, at first, the fall guy for the corporate gang at Fox is now backpedling and placing all the blame on FOX!!! They had, at first, given him the criteria to 'limit' invitations and convinced him to send them out. I sent him a very pointed list of reasons why he may have just shot himself (and the NH Republican Party) in the foot and as usual, now the blame game ensues... The end result is still the same. I believe many who don't know about the Ron Paul explosion on the web will not come to the realization that he is the only candidate standing for the real core beliefs of the true conservative in this country. Moreover, he is the ONLY candidate who I believe embodies the real "Patriot" spirit of our forefathers. A Libratarian of sorts and a very REAL American, something I can't say for the remaining candidates. Open your wallets and give to this mans campaign or the corporate wolves will open it for you after they elect THEIR candidate!!! Buy some signs... bumper stickers... SlimJims... and pass them out at intersections in YOUR town... That's what we're doing... This is how that 'non-web' group will find out about the Ron Paul Experience!!!
Good Luck and God Bless Ron Paul...
Posted by: David | January 1, 2008 03:47 AM
not much of a democracy with free speech after all!
Posted by: slim from england | January 1, 2008 10:52 AM
This is the most important factor to take into consideration when thinking about Ron Paul's chances for winning - polls do not apply. Here's why:
1) Who Gets Polled In the Big-Name Polls?
When GOP polls are taken by Zogby, Rasmussen and others, they only poll those GOP voters who either caucused or voted in the last GOP POTUS primary. But GW Bush ran unopposed in 2004, and only 6% of all GOP voters participated.
And let's face it, those that would actually go to a primary to vote for someone running unopposed are the hardcore GW Bush supporters who had to make sure the guy won the primaries. These are not people who would be likely to vote for Ron Paul, but they're a teeensy tiny percentage of total GOP voters. But when these polls are taken, these are the people that get the phone calls. The fact that as many as 10% of them in Iowa support Ron Paul is amazing.
2) Ron Paul and Disillusioned Republicans
I'm one of them, and so are many others. GW Bush ran on Ron Paul's foreign policy platform back in 1999, which is the year I voted for Bush.
After watching Bush and his cartel do precisely the opposite of what he said he'd do, then after 911, and the Iraq invasion, I joined the Constitution Party before the last election in 2003 and that's how I voted.
The press say that 25% of GOP voters are now against GW Bush's policies. The press always underreports though. I think the number is much much higher. All the other candidates are touting following the current policies of the Bush administration (with a few minor exceptions). Based on the hundreds of conversations I've had with Republicans who are voting for Paul, I believe that more GOP voters support Paul than the media lets on, and those GOP voters aren't the ones being polled.
3) Ron Paul and Independents
They're switching more and more each day. So many in this country are so sick of the Dems and GOP that they're declaring their independence. Paul is attracting them in huge numbers because he is so different. But they aren't polled.
4) Ron Paul and Disenfranchised Democrats
I am shocked at how many Democrats I've met that have become Paul supporters. They have "held their noses" and reregistered as Republicans just so they can vote for Paul. But they aren't polled.
5) Ron Paul and Libertarians
Recently, the LP asked Paul if he'd run on their ticket and he refused. Why? Because LP candidates don't participate in debates and get even less attention than Paul gets now. Paul must stay in the mainstream party at least until after February 5th or he'll really get ignored. But is that going to stop LP voters from voting for him? NO WAY! They're registering GOP in the states that require declaring fo primaries. And they too, are not polled.
6) Ron Paul and the Constitution Party
The CP is now the third-largest party in the United States. Some in it's own leadership are supporting Ron Paul, the most notable being Chuck Baldwin. The argument rages across the Internet: Should CP members support a candidate that isn't running on their ticket or should they cut off their noses to spite their faces? The concensus seesm to be: How many chances like this will we ever get? CP Party members seem to agree there won't be many. As I am a CP member, I am on many forums where I see this daily. And they don't get polled either.
7) Ron Paul and Leftist Liberals
Yes, even MoveOn.org members and others support Paul, though on one issue alone. That of course is his foreign policy platform of non-interventionism. But the fact that even these liberals would support Paul speaks volumes about his cross-party support. Think these liberals get polled? NOT!
8 International Support:
Paul has more meetup groups, organizations and supporters in other countries than any other candidate. For years, the rest of the world has been dismayed at an ever increasing imperialism of the United States around the world. Paul wants to stop that. Do these supporters have influence? You bet they do! There are millions of new voters in the United States in the form of new naturalized citizens. Those new citizens, proud of their newly-gained status, almost always vote. But they aren't polled.
9) Military Support:
Paul gets the most money from our military than any other candidate in either party. But guess what? They aren't polled!
10) How Are the Big-Name Polls Conducted?
While this may be a minor point (and therefore deserves last place), it IS a factor. All the national and state big name polls are conducted using land line phones. Folks who use only cellular phones aren't getting polled, even if they did vote in the GOP primary in 2003.
When you combine all these factors together, it becomes clear that poll numbers mean nothing when it comes to predicting Ron Paul's viability.
If your only reason for not supporting Ron Paul is you don't see him doing well in these polls, I suggest you rethink your position.
Posted by: Dave | January 1, 2008 11:09 AM
Saint Anselm had their own Mock Primary and students voted for Ron Paul five times more than Thompson. Ask the students and faculty what they think of Fox's decision...
http://www.anselm.edu/Ask+Saint+Anselm.htm
Posted by: Saul Tanner | January 1, 2008 09:03 PM
Excellent summation on the polling process and the noteworthy reasons for not paying any attention to the "national polls". However, my unrelenting concern continues to be the PTB fixing the vote via Diebold Corp. ( see Bush/Gore election 2000 and Diebold software given to representative of Jeb Bush to fix 2000 election ) and the Voter News Service. There has never been any independent citizenry oversight of VNS during any vote counting in national elections. They don't allow it! It's forbidden in a supposed democratic society. I don't care how many Dr. Paul supporters we have overlooking the process at the precincts on election day, how does one overcome this truly insidious problem? You are talking about software inside the voting machines and an organizination (VNS) counting votes with absolutely no independent oversight. The current electoral system is specifically designed to fix elections. I honestly don't know the answer to or how we resolve this ongoing problem.
Posted by: Robert | January 1, 2008 10:35 PM
Excellent summation on the polling process and the noteworthy reasons for not paying any attention to the "national polls". However, my unrelenting concern continues to be the PTB fixing the vote via Diebold Corp. ( see Bush/Gore election 2000 and Diebold software given to representative of Jeb Bush to fix 2000 election ) and the Voter News Service. There has never been any independent citizenry oversight of VNS during any vote counting in national elections. They don't allow it! It's forbidden in a supposed democratic society. I don't care how many Dr. Paul supporters we have overlooking the process at the precincts on election day, how does one overcome this truly insidious problem? You are talking about software inside the voting machines and an organizination (VNS) counting votes with absolutely no independent oversight. The current electoral system is specifically designed to fix elections. I honestly don't know the answer to or how we resolve this ongoing problem.
Posted by: Robert | January 1, 2008 10:35 PM
Don't forget, as Josef Stalin once said, "Those who cast the votes decide nothing, those who count the votes decide everything".
Posted by: Robert | January 1, 2008 11:17 PM
There is more to viability than polls. It is outrageous that they would invite Thompson and not Paul. Thompson's campaign has no money. And Thompson failed to secure a ballot position in DE and DC. It only takes 280 signitures in DC to get on the ballot and 1000 signatures in DE to get on the ballot. This is a testament to the weakness of Thompson's campaign. How can you be a front-runner with no money and the inability to secure ballot positions in all 50 States? Thompson should do the honorable thing: resign and offer his seat at the forum to Paul.
Posted by: rhys | January 2, 2008 10:14 AM
i have been preaching the same concern (DIEBOLD)as my fellow Dr. Ron Paul supporter Robert in this blog but nobody had come up with a valid answer or solution yet for this very important issue, where are our brainiest computer geeks Ron Paul fans i am desperatly waiting for any solution or we just have to show up at least 3 to 1 excess at all debates and voting polls
Posted by: laszlo | January 2, 2008 12:55 PM
Is Fox fair and balanced? Take the poll…
http://surveyg2.pollingpoint.com/v3r7RgTsGXrhg8
I think Dr. Paul should be included in all debates PERIOD…
Dr. Ron Paul in 2008
Posted by: Collin 28 | January 2, 2008 03:27 PM
Fox "News" is showing their true colors on this one. Shine the cockroaches out onto the tiles. :)
Posted by: Anthony Lilja | January 2, 2008 08:22 PM