Return to the Free Liberal Homepage

« The L Word | Main | Ron Paul v. the Beltway Libertarians »

Bomb Iran, bomb, bomb, Iran

One would think that US intelligence reports that Iran has not been working on nuclear weapons for several years now would be welcomed as great news and that the Bush Administration might cool the rhetoric and take some of the heat off....of course, that would be in a rational world, not Bush's. Of course, as Justin Raimondo points out, the neocons, many of whom are quite close to the Bush Administration and the Giuliani campaign oppose any effort to tone down the rhetoric.

It would seem that no matter what Iran does, some will spin Iran's actions as a reason for sanctions and threats. The question for "mainstream libertarians" like Eric Dondero and other Iran hawks is whether the average American really would support war with Iran and exactly what such a move would achieve for their security.

Comments

No, the question is why is it that Leftist Libertarians such as you all, are now all of a sudden talking about a non-issue like Iran, and why you are no longer talking about Iraq?

Things a little bit uncomfortable for you all these days?

Surge working just as planned, even better than anticipated. So, you gotta change the subject.

Too cowardly to be real men and admit that you were completely and entirely wrong on Iraq.

We've won a glorious victory, desposing of the Hitler of our time, and have brought democracy and freedom to over 35 million people in the heart of the Middle East.

The least you all could do would be to step up to the plate and admit that you were wrong.

Eric Dondero, Chairman
Libertarian Defense Caucus


We stopped talking about Iraq?

Free-for-all (frfr-ôl) -- n. A disorderly fight, argument, or competition in which everyone present participates.

from Dictionary.com



Advertisement
American Conservative Defense Alliance