Return to the Free Liberal Homepage

« Response to Randy Barnett | Main | The Joys of Transpartisanship »

Logical Atomism and Truth Claims

At Marginal Revolution, Tyler Cowen explains his differences in analysis with those of his colleague Robin Hanson:

[Robin] likes to focus on one very central mechanism in seeking an explanation or developing policy advice. Modern physics and Darwin hold too strong a sway in his underlying mental models. He is also very fond of hypotheses involving the idea of a great transformation sometime in the future, and these transformations are often driven by the mechanism he has in mind. I tend to see good social science explanations or proposals as intrinsically messy and complex and involving many different perspectives, not all of which can be reduced to a single common framework. I know that many of my claims sound vague to Robin's logical atomism, but I believe that, given our current state of knowledge, Robin is seeking a false precision and he is sometimes missing out on an important multiplicity of perspectives. Many of his views should be more cautious.

I find this to be the difference between myself and Rothbardian libertarians whom I encounter. The desire to use basic principles (axioms) to inform an entire system of answers to all of life's choices and ethical dillemmas is appealing, In this framework, liberty and the free-market are favored because it is always wrong to initiate force. This is a good general rule. But, I favor liberty as a key value mainly because I believe the government lacks the knowledge to provide for the betterment of all. Similarly, as a Hayekian, I don't believe anyone has the knowledge to provide for the betterment of all. The free-market and its spontaneous order find the efficient solution where no one person could have known it ahead of time. I don't believe it is possible for anyone to hold a philosophy which holds all the answers to all questions.

In a (non-political) conservative manner, I find the more radical truth claims, made by anarcho-capitalists to be overly reliant on the power of liberty to solve all problems. There is wisdom in society for not immediately jumping on the no-government bandwagon. I believe this is the main reason why the Libertarian Party cannot become more successful without becoming less radical.

/KDR

Free-for-all (frfr-ôl) -- n. A disorderly fight, argument, or competition in which everyone present participates.

from Dictionary.com



supportus.png

If you enjoy our site or our print publication, please consider making a contribution today!


SIMPLE AD ERROR VIEW COUNT NOT UPDATED
Advertisement


Return to the Free Liberal Homepage


Subscribe to our list:



About the Free Liberal
The Free Liberal is an independent journal of transpartisan thought.

The views expressed herein are those of the writers individually and not necessarily those of the Free Liberal, the Center for Liberty and Community, or its board of directors.