Return to the Free Liberal Homepage

« Oppose a personality cult? You're a leftist! | Main | Partisan Talk Show Hosts »

Libertarian or fiscal conservative?


Reducing federal spending on "social programs," and reducing taxation, should always be priorities for libertarians, however, they are not necessarily the top priority. Especially at a time when the government is committed to waging "perpetual war for perpetual peace" and shredding the Bill of Rights in the name of freedom, reducing domestic social spending might not be our highest priority. It does not serve libertarian goals to have an imperialistic state with a balanced budget that controls our lives through freedom-stifling laws and regulations. especially since running an empire is one of the most expansive projects a government can undertake--a fact that seems to have escaped the notice of most "fiscal conservatives" inside the beltway.

Yet, too many libertarians have made focus on "fiscal conservatism" the litmus test for whether a politician deserves libertarian support. Thus, someone can support the PATRIOT Act, the Iraq war, domestic spying, the Marriage Amendment, new Federal regulations on indecency, yet still be considered a "libertarian" if they vote for Bush's tax cuts and against some domestic social spending. Again, I am not saying that taxes and welfare spending are unimportant issues. I am merely saying that a commitment to balanced budgets and reductions in the marginal tax rate does not necessarily equal a commitment to liberty.


Originally posted at the LewRockwell.com blog.

Comments

Norm is absolutely correct, to be a fiscal conservative is not necessarily to mean that one is actually for greater individual freedom, and it is true that some on the left are far more pro-individual freedom on certain things (abortion, drugs...). The truth is that to even begin to be consistenly pro-freedom, you do have to be a fiscal conservative. There are too many in Washington in particular, unfortunately, who don't see the connection between wars and bigger government.

Free-for-all (frfr-ôl) -- n. A disorderly fight, argument, or competition in which everyone present participates.

from Dictionary.com



supportus.png

If you enjoy our site or our print publication, please consider making a contribution today!


SIMPLE AD ERROR VIEW COUNT NOT UPDATED
Advertisement


Return to the Free Liberal Homepage


Subscribe to our list:



About the Free Liberal
The Free Liberal is an independent journal of transpartisan thought.

The views expressed herein are those of the writers individually and not necessarily those of the Free Liberal, the Center for Liberty and Community, or its board of directors.