| ||||
October 31, 2008Spending the Economy into Oblivionby Ron Paul With news this week that Congress is poised to consider a new stimulus package, I am forced to again ask a question that seems silly in Washington: How will we pay for this? While a few Members of Congress have raised the issue, it certainly was not the primary concern of the House Budget Committee when they interviewed Ben Bernanke on Monday. And, when they did direct this question to the Chairman of the Federal Reserve, his answer was the standard rhetoric about how Congress needed to make tough choices. Needless to say, not many specifics were discussed. One of the most liberal members of the House, Barney Frank, has at least volunteered something of a suggestion: “We can let Iraq take care of itself.” This, of course, goes in the right direction, but hardly far enough. We need to declare the facts and their obvious consequences. The deficit of the United States is now spiraling out of control, and the recent bailout package has only made it worse. Our crushing federal debt is one key reason behind our current economic turbulence. As Congress begins to consider the third “stimulus package” of the year, we need to realize it is time to start setting priorities. Priority number one should be cutting spending in foreign countries. This does not simply mean Iraq, but everywhere. The next stimulus package is likely to include money for infrastructure. While these investments are, constitutionally speaking, supposed to be made by state and local governments, it is not likely that Congress will suddenly begin to pay heed to the document we are all sworn to uphold. Still, we need to acknowledge the fact that the current Congress and Administration are rushing the nation toward bankruptcy. This being the case, we could hope they would at least come to their senses regarding our debt and foreign spending sprees. Our nation’s foreign-held debt is at record highs and moving ever higher. Continuing to borrow money from Red China and others in order to pay “dues” to the United Nations and run “Plan Colombia” makes no sense at all. Our whole carrot-and-stick approach to foreign policy makes no sense. The US government simultaneously gives money to Israel, and to Egypt. We send AIDS money to Africa while AIDS clinics in America shut down. “Millennium challenge” funding goes to countries which enact “market based reforms” as we push our own country further and further into a centrally planned economy. Economic recovery will only come through financial prudence, savings and getting back to producing things of value again. But it seems to be a foregone conclusion that we are about to enact another government initiative to “stimulate the economy.” Instead, there should be some serious talk about cutting all of these foreign giveaway programs. But, alas and again, we should not hold our breath. Congress is still not close to being serious about ending its addiction to debt and spending, and is again faced with the deadly temptation to attempt to spend us out of a recession. We should not forget that in the 1930’s those types of efforts gave us the Great Depression. Dr. Ron Paul is a Republican congressman from Texas. Return to the Free Liberal Homepage |
Share Your Thoughts About This Article, Send a Letter to the Editor.
Return to the Free Liberal Homepage
Your E-Mail Address:
| |||
Comments
Congress shall establish a system of post roads. Nothing about the highway system is unconstitutional. Aviation is also a subject for government action for the same reason.
Get a copy of Administrative Law in a Nutshell. Read it and have your staff read it. Many of the things you regard as extra-constitutional are not.
As long as interest rates remain low and Chinese labor is cheap (because of its currency price and standard of living), we will continue to borrow from China and the Pacific Rim. If their currency is allowed to go higher and/or interest rates are allowed to increase, the question will then recur whether it is better to borrow money from the rich and pay interest (borrowing to do so), or increase marginal tax rates on those who can afford to lend the government money.
Deficit financing rips off our kids, but only if they are going to pay income taxes at high marginal rates. Cutting spending and lowering tax rates slows the economy down. Cutting spending and raising tax rates spurs the economy, as does increasing spending and increasing tax rates.
Either increasing taxes or deficit financing is essential to keep the economy growing. My preference is taxes on the wealthy, provided that any surplus collected above the middle calss rate be dedicated to financing and repaying the national debt (held by both the public and government - we actually owe money to the highway trust fund by using gas tax money to finance government).
Why does this work? Wealthier individuals are more likely to save their income, because you only need so much money to live. Keeping this money in savings contracts the economy. Taxing or borrowing it for the public sector - including government contracts - increases spending at the household level.
You and I may not like the fact that the economy is dependent on the government - however that does not change the fact that it is.
Posted by: Michael Bindner | October 31, 2008 12:37 PM
Michael, are you the cuckoo from the cuckoo clock? You are wrong, boy-o,we are in this mess because the Gub'mint interfered in every aspect of the "free market" and ruined it for not only America, but the rest of the world got sucked in, too. I am poor, so I am hoping to get LOTS of tax money off the likes of YOU, and you will then help support me! Little old, poor, undereducated me. I can't WAIT !! Let the socialism begin!!!
Posted by: Denise | November 7, 2008 02:28 AM