| ||||
February 08, 2008Paving Paradiseby Ron Paul The Constitution guarantees Americans the right to be secure against all unreasonable seizures. My home state of Texas is unfortunately planning on some very unreasonable seizures of land with the monstrous Trans Texas Corridor highway project. The TTC plans call for a highway to cut through about 4,000 Texas miles, and with separate rail lines for passenger and freight, a multi-lane highway with separate truck lanes, utility and cable easements, this highway could be as wide as 1200 feet across. In the end this project would consume something like half a million acres of land in Texas . However, since the exact path of the road has not been determined, it is putting much more acreage in jeopardy, and in limbo. Taking land is destructive enough. But the perpetual threat of taking an undetermined amount of land is hanging over the heads of millions of Texans and putting their lives at a standstill. Land is a store of wealth and a source of stability. This highway project is tragically threatening that for so many Texans. The principle of private property is the cornerstone to a free and prosperous society. In situations where a colossal government land grab is a distinct possibility, investment or improvement becomes more risky with an uncertain future and tends not to happen. How do you sell land that may or may not be taken by the government at some point in the not too distant future? Who would buy it? How do you cultivate or build on, or even near, land that may or may not be paved over and turned into a massive, noisy thoroughfare in a few years? Even more insulting is the distinct possibility that, while the road will collect tolls and fees, making a private foreign firm billions of dollars in revenue, the costs of building it could be heavily borne by taxpayers. So the costs will be socialized and the profits privatized. Public-private partnership indeed! From Washington I have voiced my staunch disapproval of taking these hard-working taxpayers’ land for a private toll road, by introducing legislation (HR 5191) that simply states, “No Federal funds appropriated or made available before, on, or after the date of enactment of this Act may be used by a unit of Federal, State, or local government to carry out the highway project known as the 'Trans-Texas Corridor'.” I am working hard in Congress to make sure that no Federal funding is used to undermine property rights in this way. We should be focusing on guarding and securing our borders for the protection of the American people. Instead we are paving the way for more and more people to cross the border as comfortably as possible. And taking the family farm to do it. It is an absolute outrage. Dr. Paul is a Republican congressman from Texas. Return to the Free Liberal Homepage |
Share Your Thoughts About This Article, Send a Letter to the Editor.
Return to the Free Liberal Homepage
Your E-Mail Address:
| |||
Comments
I understand and agree, I think, with the concept here, but wouldn't that mean that every public road ever built in this country is an assault on private land ownership? Maybe that's true, but isn't it necessary at some basic level? How am I determine which roads are okay and which aren't okay?
Posted by: Jeff | February 8, 2008 10:15 AM
Hey Jeff,
Not sure if we read the same article, but I think it's clear that Dr. Paul is upset at several things, one you address: the taking of private land without the owners consent (and without "just" compensation, no doubt), another, causing chaos in the real-estate market by simply hanging over the possibility of this or that land being taken (instead of keeping quiet until the route is selected), forming a corporatist government relationship with some monopoly to manage it (giving us the govt. authority and monopoly of socialism, without the democratic political rules and backlash), and, perhaps worst of all, forcing every poor sucker in the U.S. to pay for part of it.
This whole thing needs to be rethought, or IMHO, forgotten.
Posted by: Bo Zimmerman | February 8, 2008 07:10 PM
You're just summarizing his article, not answering my question, If it's wrong to confiscate private land for public roads, then shouldn't I oppose the entire road system (for starters)? There's probably no one here, me included, who would advocate that approach, so how to I reconcile the inconsistency of, "It's wrong, but I support it sometimes." I want to know when it's NOT wrong for a government to confiscate private land for public roads, which will help me understand when it IS wrong.
I didn't mention the real estate aspect because I had no questions about it.
Posted by: Jeff Stallard | February 11, 2008 09:39 AM
i believe that whenever the government takes personal property by force, it should be questioned. in this particular instance, from what i understand from other sources, the tolls generated from the road are going to go to private companies. so, although the road will be used by the public, the profits generated will go to private companies, therefore these peoples property are being taken to line the pockets of some corporation. that makes it wrong.
Posted by: ringslinga | February 14, 2008 03:40 PM